<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should You Buy Earthquake Insurance?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everybodylovesyourmoney.com/2010/01/15/should-you-buy-earthquake-insurance.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everybodylovesyourmoney.com/2010/01/15/should-you-buy-earthquake-insurance.html</link>
	<description>Living for today - Planning for Tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:38:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everybody Loves Your Money - Living for today &#8211; Planning for Tomorrow &#187; Do We Need Earthquake Insurance?</title>
		<link>http://www.everybodylovesyourmoney.com/2010/01/15/should-you-buy-earthquake-insurance.html/comment-page-1#comment-194116</link>
		<dc:creator>Everybody Loves Your Money - Living for today &#8211; Planning for Tomorrow &#187; Do We Need Earthquake Insurance?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everybodylovesyourmoney.com/?p=1090#comment-194116</guid>
		<description>[...] Earthquake Insurance?   By Hazzard This is a question I’ve struggled with over the years and have posted about in the past.&#160; I’ve gone back and forth on whether I should have earthquake [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earthquake Insurance?   By Hazzard This is a question I’ve struggled with over the years and have posted about in the past.&#160; I’ve gone back and forth on whether I should have earthquake [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hazzard</title>
		<link>http://www.everybodylovesyourmoney.com/2010/01/15/should-you-buy-earthquake-insurance.html/comment-page-1#comment-193871</link>
		<dc:creator>Hazzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everybodylovesyourmoney.com/?p=1090#comment-193871</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t call it a reactive move.  I&#039;ve had the earthquake insurance for the last 5 years.  I buy it for the same reason that I have homeowners insurance, car insurance, and life insurance.  I&#039;m making the personal choice to manage the risk by spending a little bit of money.  Certainly not everyone will make the same decision.  Sounds like you have your own approach to managing risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t call it a reactive move.  I&#8217;ve had the earthquake insurance for the last 5 years.  I buy it for the same reason that I have homeowners insurance, car insurance, and life insurance.  I&#8217;m making the personal choice to manage the risk by spending a little bit of money.  Certainly not everyone will make the same decision.  Sounds like you have your own approach to managing risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RP</title>
		<link>http://www.everybodylovesyourmoney.com/2010/01/15/should-you-buy-earthquake-insurance.html/comment-page-1#comment-193865</link>
		<dc:creator>RP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 03:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everybodylovesyourmoney.com/?p=1090#comment-193865</guid>
		<description>Wow, talk about a reactive move. I live in the Pacific Northwest too (WA, also near a fault line), and I feel no need to have earthquake insurance.

First: our building codes incorporate engineering to cope with the stresses of earthquake insurance for the earthquakes we are most likely to get. Even back in the late nineties when we had the magnitude ~5 earthquake, no one I know had any serious damage.

Second: The &quot;Big One&quot; that is supposed to occur is completely unpredictable. You are gambling that an earthquake is going to happen, and that it is going to cause enough damage to breech your $50,000 deductible. Go ahead and calculate the odds of that happening.

Third: your money would be better spent preventing the possibility of earthquake damage. Most states in the PNW offer earthquake retrofitting classes for free. Then you can apply the almost $4,000 you are going to spend over the next ten years on implementing those retrofits (usually just making sure the house is properly bound to the foundation, and maybe some other reinforcements).

It always amazes me that people react to what is being reported by the media - these events are extraordinary, that is why they are being reported. Spending money to have coverage for events this extraordinarily rare just seems like an emotional response. You lived this long without earthquake insurance, why do you need it now?

If I haven&#039;t swayed you, don&#039;t forget - you also need volcano, flood, and tsunami insurance. Just in case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, talk about a reactive move. I live in the Pacific Northwest too (WA, also near a fault line), and I feel no need to have earthquake insurance.</p>
<p>First: our building codes incorporate engineering to cope with the stresses of earthquake insurance for the earthquakes we are most likely to get. Even back in the late nineties when we had the magnitude ~5 earthquake, no one I know had any serious damage.</p>
<p>Second: The &#8220;Big One&#8221; that is supposed to occur is completely unpredictable. You are gambling that an earthquake is going to happen, and that it is going to cause enough damage to breech your $50,000 deductible. Go ahead and calculate the odds of that happening.</p>
<p>Third: your money would be better spent preventing the possibility of earthquake damage. Most states in the PNW offer earthquake retrofitting classes for free. Then you can apply the almost $4,000 you are going to spend over the next ten years on implementing those retrofits (usually just making sure the house is properly bound to the foundation, and maybe some other reinforcements).</p>
<p>It always amazes me that people react to what is being reported by the media &#8211; these events are extraordinary, that is why they are being reported. Spending money to have coverage for events this extraordinarily rare just seems like an emotional response. You lived this long without earthquake insurance, why do you need it now?</p>
<p>If I haven&#8217;t swayed you, don&#8217;t forget &#8211; you also need volcano, flood, and tsunami insurance. Just in case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aa</title>
		<link>http://www.everybodylovesyourmoney.com/2010/01/15/should-you-buy-earthquake-insurance.html/comment-page-1#comment-193864</link>
		<dc:creator>aa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everybodylovesyourmoney.com/?p=1090#comment-193864</guid>
		<description>I have Amica, it&#039;s like an extra 100-150 for earthquake, of course that&#039;s not the west coast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have Amica, it&#8217;s like an extra 100-150 for earthquake, of course that&#8217;s not the west coast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
