The 2026 “Junk Fee” Ban: 4 Banks That Just Got Fined for Hidden Overdraft Charges

These Are 4 Banks That Just Got Fined for Hidden Overdraft Charges

Image Source: shutterstock.com

If you thought your bank was just a friendly place to keep your cash safe, think again. The financial world has just seen one of the most dramatic shake-ups in recent memory: a sweeping crackdown on so-called junk fees that have been quietly draining everyday consumers’ accounts for years.

In 2026, regulators are finally drawing a hard line under hidden overdraft charges and buried non-sufficient funds penalties — and a handful of major banks just got hit with some of the heftiest fines in the industry’s history. What exactly went down, who got fined, and what it means for everyday banking?

The Junk Fee Ban That Shook Wall Street And Main Street

At the heart of this upheaval is a major shift in how regulators view overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees — charges that financial institutions have historically levied when your balance dipped below zero or when they processed payments you thought were covered.

In the U.S., the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has been pushing hard against junk fees, targeting mystery overdraft mechanisms and unfair fee structures as part of a broader consumer protection agenda. Recent enforcement has seen hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties against institutions that failed to play by the rules, and the trend shows no sign of slowing.

Regions Bank: A Repeat Offender Finally Answered For

Regions Bank has become something of the poster child for illegal overdraft charges. Regulators found that the institution charged customers “surprise” overdraft fees — for example, assessing fees after telling customers they had sufficient funds at the point of sale, only to hit them with charges once transactions fully processed. It was a classic junk-fee setup: misleading and harmful. Back in 2022, the CFPB ordered Regions to refund at least $191 million to consumers.

Fast forward to the junk fee ban era, and Regions found itself back in regulators’ crosshairs. The message from authorities was unmistakable: no more ambiguity or creative fee timing tricks. While Regions has been working to rectify practices, that earlier ruling remains a landmark moment in establishing regulatory intolerance for crafty overdraft revenue engines.

Bank Of America: Double-Dipping Under The Microscope

Bank of America once faced intense scrutiny over its overdraft and NSF fee practices, particularly a “double-dipping” method that charged customers multiple fees on the same transaction when merchants resubmitted it after an initial decline. In that earlier action, Bank of America agreed to pay $250 million in penalties and refunds after regulators concluded the bank unlawfully charged these fees — a fine that covered a variety of bad practices, including these junk fee schemes.

Those fines helped pave the way for broader enforcement, signaling to other big banks that regulators were serious about clawing back unfair charges. The 2026 junk fee ban accelerates this momentum. It makes it clear that banks will be held accountable not just retrospectively. Under new rules designed to stamp out hidden fees before they ever appear on a statement.

Atlantic Union Bank: Illegal Overdraft Enrollment

Atlantic Union Bank found itself in trouble for a slightly different variation on the overdraft fee theme. Regulators found widespread improper enrollment in overdraft programs. Thousands of customers were opted in without proper consent, meaning they were set up to incur junk fees they never agreed to incur in the first place. The CFPB ordered the bank to refund at least $6.2 million in illegal fees and pay additional penalties.

This case is a great example of how junk fees don’t always come from the fee itself. It underscores how consumers get trapped into fee-bearing services without clear disclosure or meaningful consent. Under the new regimes, transparency and consent are front and center.

Navy Federal Credit Union: The Case Of The Vanishing Settlement

One of the most dramatic stories in the junk fee crackdown involves Navy Federal Credit Union. It’s technically a credit union, not a bank, but it operated much like one when charging overdraft fees. In 2024, regulators had ordered Navy Federal to pay more than $95 million for illegal surprise overdraft fees, including refunds to members. That move would have been the largest CFPB penalty against a credit union.

However, in mid-2025 the CFPB abruptly withdrew the order. They nullified the settlement entirely under new leadership.

Though this twist leaves some consumers without the redress they might have expected, it remains a crucial chapter in the broader story.

Image Source: shutterstock.com

What It All Means For You

If you bank with any of these institutions, there’s a good chance that the way overdraft, NSF, and related fees are applied to your account will look very different in 2026 and beyond. Whether it’s a cap on fees, stricter consent requirements, or simpler, clearer disclosures, consumers are finally getting some protections.

Got a story about overdraft drama or a junk fee that made you want to scream? Drop your thoughts or experiences in the comments below — we want to hear how this wave of change is hitting your wallet!